Prepared for Wyle Maddox
Lea Wey & Shaugnessy Fish, Pacer Revenue Management
August 20, 2026
Revenue Strategy Review · Coastal Shore Vacations

The strategy holds. Alignment is the gap.

Recap of Pacer's original findings, recommendations, and early wins, plus the current market context and the decisions needed on fees, 2027 booking policy, and reservation process to keep the strategy aligned going forward.

ChincoteagueCape CharlesPresented Aug 20, 2026Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review
9 → 11/day
Booking velocity, between reporting periods
49 → 117 days
Average booking window, as 2027 demand entered
+$30K
Upper Shore two-week pickup vs. LY
5
Decisions needed to keep pricing and reservations aligned
Where We Are

Executive summary

Pacer's work with Coastal has centered on four connected themes. The strategy is still sound, but the operating model needs to be tightened so pricing, reservations, fees, and owner communication all support the same goals.

Original opportunity

Coastal had strong demand signals, unusually long lead time, and an established direct-repeat base. Upside came from monetizing that demand better.

Structural challenge

Heavy flat and minimum fees inflated guest-facing totals, especially on smaller homes and off-season stays.

Early results

Future reservations and pickup showed stronger rate capture when far-out inventory was priced with actual, protected rates.

Current need

Leadership alignment is needed on fees, 2027 availability, manual overrides, OTA commission handling, and reporting process.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 2
Baseline

Original audit: strong base, clear structural upside

The original audit showed a company with demand, repeat-booking strength, and several high-performing segments. The opportunity was to turn that demand into cleaner revenue through better rate protection, fee structure, LOS strategy, and OTA visibility.

Upper Shore Fees to Rent
37.93%
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026
Lower Shore Fees to Rent
39.06%
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026
Waterfront 1-3BR Booking Window vs Market
153 vs 63
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026
Chincoteague LOS vs Market
10.4 vs 4.2
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026

Original recommendations

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 3
Fees

Fee structure: what Pacer recommended and why

The fee recommendation was designed to preserve fee revenue while making the guest-facing total more proportional and competitive, especially for off-season and smaller-home bookings.

Recommended structure

Processing fee

Combine reservation, credit card, and keyless fee revenue into one percentage-based processing fee. After keyless was rolled into the reservation fee, the refined recommendation was approximately 9%.

Damage waiver

Reduce from 8% to approximately 4.25%, based on prior-year collections around 4%, so Coastal does not give up the intended fee stream.

Linen / amenity fee

Evaluate moving linen markup, or a portion of it, into a percentage-based amenity structure. Leave cleaning alone initially.

Why it matters: a flat or minimum fee can become a very high share of rent when ADR is lower, making the property look less bookable even if the nightly rate itself is competitive.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 4
Fees

Current fee issue: partial implementation still affects results

The concern is that some fee revenue is still behaving like a flat or minimum burden, which creates the exact off-season and smaller-home issue the original recommendation was meant to solve.

Observed effect, Shell Cottage example: base rent had to be reduced to under $70 per night for a $190 per night guest-facing rate on a 3-night stay. Some recently booked reservations had fee-to-rent ratios over 70%, many were over 50%.

Why that matters

  • Makes rate reductions look like they did not reach the guest.
  • Creates owner confusion between nightly rate, guest total, and payout.
  • Hurts the same smaller and off-season homes that already face the most competition.

Decision needed

  • Confirm whether Coastal wants to complete the percentage-based fee strategy.
  • Confirm how minimums and channel limitations should be handled.
  • Agree how fees should be explained to homeowners.

Recommended framing for Wyle: this is a revenue-structure discussion, not just a lower-the-fees discussion.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 5
2027 Booking Strategy

Advance reservations: the strategy was to monetize lead time

Coastal naturally books farther out than the broader market. Pacer's recommendation was not to stop that behavior. It was to protect the value of that demand by booking future stays with actual rates and better rate controls.

1
Before

Legacy advance holds

Guest held future dates with minimal deposit and no finalized rent until later. This made pacing hard to interpret.

2
Shift

Real-rate booking window

Public online availability capped around 365 days, with repeat-guest opportunity before dates opened more broadly.

3
Protect

Far-out premium

Rates protected higher far out to maximize earning potential.

4
Use

Better data

Reservations carry actual revenue, so Pacer and Coastal can read pace earlier and adjust sooner.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 6
Reservation Evidence

Advance-booking wins already showed the upside

When future reservations came in at protected rates, the results were visible quickly in booking velocity, booking window, and reservation value.

Booking Velocity
9 → 11/day
Increase between reporting periods
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026
Average Booking Window
49 → 117 days
Expansion as 2027 demand entered
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026
Upper Shore Two-Week Pickup
+$30K
vs. same period last year
Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026

These wins are the reason Pacer recommended keeping future demand bookable with real, protected rates rather than reverting to no-rate holds or closing OTA visibility.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 7
Market Conditions

Current market context: Chincoteague

So far this year, Coastal Shore Vacations was mostly in line with the greater Chincoteague market, though it outperformed the market in peak season RevPAR, occupancy, ADR, and LOS.

RevPAR outperformed, peak season
Occupancy outperformed, peak season
ADR outperformed, peak season
LOS outperformed, peak season

Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 8
Market Conditions

Current market context: Cape Charles

The newer Cape Charles segment has shown continued year-over-year growth, with total RevPAR almost matching market in peak season, strong ADR growth, and a LOS much more in line with the market.

Continued year-over-year growth
Total RevPAR near market, peak season
Strong ADR growth
LOS more in line with market

Source: Coastal Shore Vacations Strategy Review, Aug 20, 2026

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 9
Where Process Matters

Operational alignment items affecting results

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 10
Decision Requests

Action items

The goal is to align the operating model so Pacer can manage revenue with clean inputs and clear guardrails.

1

Confirm fee path

Complete the percentage-based fee strategy or define a different target structure Pacer can price around.

2

Confirm 2027 booking policy

Decide whether future OTA inventory should be open, blocked, or open with clear repeat-guest rules.

3

Mirror OTA promotions

Use the "Specials" page to advertise "Last Minute" and "Early Bird" promotions.

4

Airbnb fee solution

Create a standard explanation for Airbnb commission, OTA fee, and owner payout differences.

5

Establish one point of contact

Confirm who owns decisions and communication.

Once these are confirmed, Pacer can keep focusing on the work Coastal hired us to do: maximize revenue opportunities while protecting owner expectations and guest conversion.
Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 11
The Path Forward

The path forward

Pacer's recommendation is to keep the core strategy in place, but remove the operational noise around it.

If these decisions are aligned, Pacer can continue optimizing Coastal's portfolio with stronger rate protection, clearer performance reporting, and a better guest-facing value proposition.

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 12
Looking Ahead

Additional recommendations for the future

Pacer's recommendation is to keep the core strategy in place, but remove the operational noise around it.

Consider PriceLabs instead of RevMax

Better software at a lower cost, with the potential to save thousands annually.

Consider Guesty instead of Streamline

A more modern, integration-rich platform with stronger automation, connectivity, and scalability.

Revisit linen / cleaning fee structure

Better align guest costs with stay value and improve off-season competitiveness.

Lea Wey & Shaugnessy Fish · Pacer Revenue Management · pacerrev.com

Revenue Strategy ReviewCoastal Shore Vacations · Page 13